San, L; Serrano, M; Canas, F; Romero, SL; Sanchez-Cabezudo, A; Villar, M

[San, Luis] CIBERSAM, Hosp St Joan Deu, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, E-08950 Barcelona, Spain; [Serrano, Manuel] Complejo Univ Hosp A Coruna, Dept Psychiat, La Coruna, Spain; [Canas, Fernando] Hosp Dr R Lafora, Dept Psychiat, Madrid, Spain; [Canas, Fernando] Univ Francisco de Vitoria, Sch Med, Madrid, Spain; [Leopoldo Romero, Samuel] UGC Hosp Virgen Macarena, Dept Psychiat, Seville, Spain; [Sanchez-Cabezudo, Angeles] Complejo Hosp Toledo, Dept Psychiat, Toledo, Spain; [Villar, Mariano] Hosp Prov Castellon, Dept Psychiat, Policlin Psiquiatr, Castellon de La Plana, Spain

Objective. To develop pragmatic and operational definitions of relapse in schizophrenia. Methods. A two-round Delphi consensus approach was used. The final questionnaire based on seven pre-established definition relapse models developed by a panel of eight experts was presented to 33 general psychiatrists who attended an "ad hoc" meeting. Results. The most frequent components of the pragmatic definition were the psychopathological severity of the psychotic spectrum (70%), more intense management of the case (68%), a previously stabilized episode (67%), and impairment in functioning and social behavior (67%). In the operational definition, reappearance of symptoms was considered indispensable by 71% of the participants, and reappearance of positive symptoms measured by clinical scales was considered recommendable by 67%. Between 46% and 53% rated worsening of severity status and worsening of functioning as indispensable or recommendable. An increase of >= 10 points in the positive subscale of Positive and Negative Symptom Scale was rated by 51% of the participants, a score of 6 points in the Clinical Global Impression scale (much worse) by 89%, and a reduction of >= 20 points in the Global Assessment of Functioning scale by 62%. Conclusions. A better understanding of the definition of relapse in schizophrenia is necessary to improve effective prevention strategies.